Federal drug laws produce a labeling problem. When you hear the term "drug trafficker," you may think of Pablo Escobar or Walter White, however the truth is that under federal law, drug traffickers include individuals who buy pseudo-ephedrine for their methamphetamine dealership; function as middleman in a series of little transactions; and even get a suitcase for the incorrect friend. Thanks to conspiracy laws, everybody on the totem pole can be subject to the same serious mandatory minimum sentences.
To the men and ladies who prepared our federal drug laws in 1986, this might come as a surprise. According to Sen. Robert Byrd, cosponsor of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986, the factor to attach five- and ten-year compulsory sentences to drug trafficking was to punish "the kingpins-- the masterminds who are actually running these operations", and the mid-level dealers.
Fast forward twenty-five years. Today, practically everybody convicted of a federal drug criminal offense is founded guilty of "drug trafficking", which generally leads to at least a five- or ten-year compulsory prison sentence. That's a lot of time in federal jail for many people who are minor parts of drug trade, the large bulk of whom are men and women of color.
This is the system that federal district Judge Mark Bennett sees every day. Judge Bennett rests on the district court in northern Iowa, and he handles a lot of drug cases. "Never ever might I have thought of," he writes in a current piece in The Nation, "that ... after nineteen years [as a federal district court judge], I would have sent out 1,092 of my fellow citizens to federal jail for mandatory minimum sentences ranging from sixty months to life without the possibility of release. Most of these women, guys and young people are nonviolent drug addicts." What about the kingpins? "I can count them on one hand," he says.
The numbers can't communicate the unreasonable tragedy of everything. This is how he explains a recent drug trafficking case:
I just recently sentenced a group of more than twenty offenders on meth trafficking conspiracy charges. Eighteen were 'pill smurfers,' as federal prosecutors put it, indicating their function amounted to regularly buying and delivering cold medication to meth cookers in exchange for really small, low-grade quantities to feed their serious dependencies. All of them dealt with mandatory minimum sentences of sixty or 120 months.
They discovered that in 2005, the bulk of the lowest-level drug- and crack-trafficking offenders-- men and women described as "street-level dealerships", "couriers/mules", and "renter/loader/lookout/ enabler/users"-- got 5- or ten-year mandatory jail sentences. This is specifically real for crack-cocaine accused, most of whom are black; despite the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010, selling a small quantity of crack cocaine (28 grams) carries the same mandatory minimum sentence-- five years-- as offering 500 grams of powder drug.
This is the truth for which advocates of serious federal drug laws should account. We should admit that our sentencing of minor players in the drug trade to prison terms meant for the leaders of big drug companies-- as a typical event, not as an exception.
If prolonged necessary minimum sentences for nonviolent addict really worked, one might be able to rationalize them. But there is no evidence that they do. I have actually seen find out here now how they leave hundreds of thousands of young kids parent-less and countless aging, infirm and dying parents childless. They damage households and strongly fuel the cycle of hardship and dependency.
Here, once again, we have proof that Judge Bennett is right: long necessary sentences are unnecessary for many drug offenders. In 2002 and 2003, Michigan and New York rescinded compulsory sentences for drug wrongdoers and provided judges the power to impose much shorter sentences, probation, or drug treatment. The sky didn't fall, but criminal activity rates did. So did jail costs.
He has actually seen necessary laws written for the most serious, massive drug dealerships applied to the men and women on the least expensive rungs of the drug trade, and he has actually seen it happen a lot. We once envisioned that serious obligatory sentences would be utilized to deal with the leaders of large drug operations.
If you have been charged with a drug related offense and need qualified representation, contact us to discuss your case.
Contact:
Mace Yampolsky & Associates
625 S 6th St.
Las Vegas, NV 89101
(702) 385-9777